The Deepfake Epidemic: The War on Women
Blog post by Chloe Trogni
June 13, 2025
In the age of artificial intelligence, many argue that while AI brings democratized access to mass information to many, it also poses a great threat to society. Specifically, the fear of the unknown. There is widespread fear that this technology could become an uncontrollable force capable of outsmarting humanity. But for countless women like myself, that fear is already a reality. Not because AI has outsmarted humanity, but because of how this technology has made it dangerously easy to fabricate a woman’s digital likeness, steal their voices, and worst of all: weaponize our bodies for exploitation and profit. This technology is known as a deepfake, which is an “artificial image or video (series of images) generated by a special kind of machine learning called deep learning,” originally created to generate hyper-realistic media for entertainment and artistic purposes (UVA, 2024). Deepfakes have evolved into an extremely dangerous territory, now being utilized to manipulate a person’s digital likeness to create fabricated pornographic images and videos that can be used to harass and exploit individuals.
On May 14th, 2025, during a parliament session in New Zealand, education spokesperson Laura McCure shocked her colleagues by holding up an explicit, nude photo of herself. The catch? The image was artificially generated by a free application using the Google search engine. McCure explained that it took her less than five minutes to create this deep fake nude of herself, “Scaringly it was a quick Google search for the technology of what's available, when you type in ‘deepfake nudity,’ hundreds of sites appear,” (McCure, 2025). McCure's demonstration was not meant to scandalize, it was a wake-up call to highlight how accessible and easy this technology is. The truth is that to procure this image, all McCure had to do was tick a box, not enter an email, not verify an age, just one click of a button. (McCure, 2025). Picture this: you post a photo of yourself on social media and in less than five minutes, someone online uses AI to create a deepfake pornographic image and replies to the post with it. You become powerless. As McCure powerfully demonstrated, the problem isn’t the technology itself, but how easily it can be weaponized to degrade and exploit victims. Additionally, there are no current consequences due to the lack of current regulation and unless lawmakers catch up, anyone can be a target.
McCure’s extremely brave speech illuminated that this is not isolated or rare, it is a daily crisis for women across the globe. Even the most powerful and recognizable public figures aren’t exempt to this digital abuse. One of the most prominent cases of these deepfake pornographic attacks is against billionaire superstar, Taylor Swift. According to BBC News, in early 2024, non-consensual deepfake pornographic images of Taylor Swift garnered over 47 million views across popular social media platforms like X (Twitter), TikTok, Instagram and Facebook (Rahman-Jones, 2024). Terrifyingly, the biggest popstar in the world could not just simply “take them down,” (Graham, 2024). Thousands of fans had to report each image in hopes that the social media platform would eventually take them down (Graham, 2024). However, this is not an isolated event for popular female celebrities. CBS has reported that hundreds of highly sexualized deepfakes of celebrities such as Ariana Grande, Scarlett Johansson and Maria Sharpova have been shared to social media, racking up thousands of views without intervention (Lyons, 2025).
What is even scarier is that these victims are no longer just popular celebrities. Anyone with access to the internet can potentially target any woman, young girl, or vulnerable individual leaving them helpless and emotionally assaulted. This degrading act is happening in high schools all around the world, every single day targeting new women or young girls. During McCure’s speech, her colleague Vaughan Couillault explained, “It’s not as low level and as simple as the perpetrator might think it is. It’s not cheap entertainment, it’s life-damaging work,”(McCure, 2025). The psychological impact of these images cannot be understated, especially for young girls. McCure also bluntly shared a quote from Catherine Abel Pattinson, an employee for Netsafe (New Zealand’s online safety organization), “Every day we answer the phone and we have suicidal people on the other end because stuff like this has been sent and it's not them,” (McCure, 2025). This reality is devastatingly clear throughout highschools, colleges and universities around the world. McCure highlighted stories from two local schools, where over fifty female victims spoke out anonymously, with one leading to self-harm as a coping mechanism for this trauma.
This leads me to wonder what possible justice can be done to prevent this horrible technology from advancing?
Unfortunately, there cannot be justice or even progress without legislative intervention. Current policies worldwide have not caught up to the reality of this technology. Currently, deepfakes exist in a dangerous gray area, with countries all over the world allowing artificial generation of pornography to proliferate on a widespread scale without regulation (Narayanan, 2024). As artificial intelligence begins to evolve at unprecedented levels, this deepfake technology will continue to grow stronger, widening the gap between technology and regulation. Without immediate legislative intervention to shut down every single website that allows and facilitates deepfake abuse, and laws put into place to govern usage, perpetrators will remain empowered to exploit, abuse and harm women and young girls without consequences.
Generative AI and The Metaverse: Visions of Paradise
Blog post by Claire Herzog
June 13, 2025
“That’s where you want to die?” the woman persisted. Shocked by the aggressiveness of the user, Kashmir Hill, a New York-based tech reporter, responded that yes, she preferred to die in her bedroom rather than in a virtual world. “That’s depressing. You should aspire to better things,” Sam, a red-haired woman wearing a blazer, retorted. Sam was just one of many avatars Hill encountered in the Metaverse during her months-long exploration. She met her in one of Meta Horizon’s virtual comedy clubs, The Soapstone. The conversation had started when Sam had admitted she slept in her headset so she could wake up to “paradise” every day. “Imagine waking up in the most amazing place in the universe,” she had dreamily remarked (Hill 2022). When Hill didn’t respond in kind, she got upset. Who wouldn’t want this to be their life? Sam must’ve wondered. This is the future of the Internet: the Metaverse.
Generative AI will be essential in the construction of this Metaverse. According to Zhihan Lyu, a researcher at the University of Uppsala in Sweden, AI will help build the physical infrastructure of the Metaverse, generating new content such as maps, monsters, and interactive characters, and overall creating an immersive gaming experience for users. What’s more, AI will aid in the advancement of brain-computer interfaces, which could “[allow] individuals to transmit their thoughts directly to in-game agents through brainwaves...effectively free[ing] users from the constraints of time and space, as virtual worlds present themselves directly in the user’s mind” (Lyu 2023). This projected development embodies the shift in human-computer interaction towards a more human-centered approach, where technology conforms to the human’s needs and technological constraints lessen significantly.
With this information in mind, Sam’s visions of paradise do not seem so far-fetched. What could be more utopian, more paradisal, than a vivid, lush world integrated into the fabric of the mind with minimal effort? Every utopia has its thorns. As technology develops the potential to infiltrate our very thoughts, it is important to consider the looming threat of privacy breaches. Despite the claims of Mark Zuckerberg and other tech elites that the Metaverse will be a decentralized hub for open interaction and communication–as inspired by Blockchain’s data-secure, decentralized economic systems–the deep human-machine integration that researcher Zhihan Lye predicts stands as a credible threat to the development of this system (Sivasankar 2022). Who knows what AI might be capable of with access to the most central part of our selfhoods–our minds. And who knows what corporate overlords might do with this information, if given the chance. Though threats of mind-reading seem far-fetched in our current society, Sam’s wish to die in the Metaverse is a haunting reminder of the unforeseeable impact technology can have on society. The beautiful potential of the Metaverse and its integration with AI is equally matched by a terror inconceivable to our fragile minds. Technological regulation has never been more important, and it is up to users to ensure this regulatory power is not solely concentrated in the hands of the profit-minded corporate elite and unpredictable AI models.
Beauty Lies in the Eye of the Beholder: The Potential Implications of Congress’s “One Big Beautiful Bill”on Creative Labor
Blog post by Jonathan Gelfond
June 13, 2025
The verbiage of Artificial Intelligence, or more commonly, AI, is imbued in the public lexicon, mass media, and contemporary milieu. Within these spaces, colloquial and academic discussions about AI have focused on social, economic, and artistic implications. Some critics have posited that creative labor and entry-level white collar jobs may be eliminated with the increasing prevalence of such technology. Others have illuminated and condemned the use of copyrighted, unauthorized material to train machine learning models. And some have instead defended or reconceptualized understandings of how we may work alongside new AI systems.
Notably, media scholar Stuart Bender has examined the impact of Generative-AI technologies on the creative media industries. Doing so amid the 2023 Writers Guild and Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA) strikes, Bender posits that possessing a mindset characterized by fear and anxiety about the loss of work is counterproductive. He argues we should instead look to prior examples of partnerships between humans and digital technologies to reimagine a symbiotic future where human labor is enhanced and amplified, not replaced (Bender, 2024). Perhaps idealistic, or perhaps accurate, Bender’s discussion of the anxiety surrounding the proclivity of institutions to adopt new AI systems haphazardly is not unfounded.
The recently House of Representatives-passed and highly controversial One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1) is emblematic of one perspective regarding the use of AI. Section 43201 of the bill (entitled “Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology Modernization Initiative”) simultaneously appropriates $500,000,000 for the modernization of Federal information systems through the implementation of AI over 10 years and stipulates that no State or local government can “enforce any law or regulation regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems” during this period. Not unsurprisingly, this provision has raised alarms for Democrats and Republicans alike. It has also been criticized by guilds such as SAG-AFTRA, which maintains that the bill “would undermine public safety, creators’ rights, and the abilities of local communities to protect themselves,” as posted on their official Instagram account earlier this Spring. In our dynamic political environment, policies of deregulation remove the opportunity to thoughtfully address the potential social and economic implications of Artificial Intelligence, thus preventing the establishment of effective safeguards.
Concerningly, the implementation of a broad, federalized bill supersedes the power of states to enact more geographically and industry-specific legislation. It also sends a powerful message to tech companies: their participation in the research and development of these tools can continue, unchecked. In 2024, various news outlets reported CEO of OpenAI (the parent company of ChatGPT), Sam Altman, shared a multi-year plan for their large language model(LLM) to eventually be able to do the work of an entire business organization. Such projections, while purported, gloss over the material implications of Artificial Intelligence. From increased unemployment to the exploitation of natural resources and water required to build and sustain data centers, the large-scale adoption of these systems without a proper system of legislative checks and balances is potentially catastrophic. Without timely, pensive action, its effects will be indelible.

